Click to view print spread (PDF)
The Play:
Fayetteville Shale
By Cheryl Hudak
With undulating hills crisscrossed by pristine rivers, Arkansas has long been nicknamed The Natural State. Today, with the discovery and development of the Fayetteville Shale, Arkansas can also call itself The Natural Gas State.
The Fayetteville Shale formation, located between 1,000 and 8,000 feet below the bucolic landscape of North Arkansas, was discovered in late 2004 by Southwestern Energy Company (SWN). By early 2005, Chesapeake was aggressively leasing properties in White, Cleburne, Faulkner, Conway and Van Buren counties, which would comprise the core area of the play.
Today, only four years later, the Fayetteville Shale is the second most productive natural gas shale play in the U.S. and one of the nation’s 10 largest natural gas fields of any type. Chesapeake is the second-largest producer in the play with approximately 440,000 acres of leasehold. As of the 2009 second quarter, the company had 368 gross operated wells producing 325 million cubic feet gross per day. The company has identified more than 4,000 net future wells to be drilled in the Fayetteville, predicting that the play will have total ultimate production of up to 75 trillion cubic feet of equivalent (tcfe) – equal to that of the mighty Barnett Shale of Texas.
To Chesapeake employees who work in the Fayetteville, their achievement is made even sweeter by the fact that the area had no history of oil and gas development of any kind when the company entered the region.
“When we arrived here, there was no exploration and production east of Conway County,” said Rich McClanahan, District Manager, Arkansas. “In the field, we started from scratch to build a staff, construct pipelines, add drilling rigs and vendor support. It was an impressive accomplishment for the company.”
In 2005, residents of the Fayetteville Shale had no knowledge of the industry. There was no existing infrastructure for development, compression or transportation. The area had no personnel with industry experience, so finding experienced hands and crew members was a challenge.
Despite these limitations, Chesapeake drilled pilot wells in late 2005. The team’s first promising well was the Ronny 1-7 in White County, a vertical well that came in at 200-300 thousand cubic feet per day (mcf/d).
“That encouraged us to continue,” noted Craig Manaugh, Vice President – Operations, Northern Division, who at the time was assigned to the Fayetteville Shale development group. “So we drilled the Ronny 2-7H, a horizontal that we completed, borrowing some of our Barnett Shale experience. Then we drilled the Gentry 1-18H, a commercially successful horizontal well in the zone – a 2.5+ mmcf/d well – and quickly followed that up with 4 out of the next 5 being commercial wells. These early results fortified us because they were comparable rates to those found by SWN, almost 60 miles to the west, and it was becoming quickly apparent the play covered a very large area.”
Things were looking up in the Fayetteville Shale. However, success in the Arkansas shale would not be easy, because not all shales are created equal. Some, like the Barnett, are thicker and more continuous than others, with more consistent pay zones. The Fayetteville has varied pay zones, so the expertise of the company’s geological and geophysical staff plays a key role in the development. A 50-foot error in depth calculation can make the difference between success and failure, so coordination between all disciplines on the team is particularly critical. In this shale, as in so many others, the rock analysis provided by Chesapeake’s proprietary Reservoir Technology Center in Oklahoma City contributed significantly to the company’s success.
A positive effect of the region’s lack of E&P history was that its lack of existing infrastructure allowed our team to start from scratch, planning the best way to do things, locating pipelines and mapping out the entire project to do it right the first time.
“Our learning curve was accelerated by our experience in the Barnett Shale of Texas,” said McClanahan. “What it took 19 years for the industry to accomplish in the Barnett, we did in three years in the Fayetteville.”
Manaugh also reflected on how the company leveraged the transfer of knowledge, saying, “We were moving best practices in geology, drilling and completion from one major play – the Barnett – into another potentially major play – the Fayetteville.”
Both McClanahan and Manaugh give much credit for the company’s success in the Fayetteville Shale to Chesapeake’s organizational structure, with company-owned subsidiaries providing crucial field services.
“I don’t know if we could have done this with third-party drilling and pipeline vendors – at least not at the pace we did,” McClanahan noted. “It took the full effort not only of Chesapeake Operating Inc., and our professional staff, but by all our field service subsidiaries: CMP, Nomac, MidCon and Great Plains to build this play. With those service subsidiaries, Chesapeake has all the pieces in place to be successful.”
Personnel was another major issue; with no history of energy production, Arkansas had very few skilled oil and gas professionals. The company encouraged field employees from Oklahoma and Texas to work in Arkansas.
“At first, some of our Oklahoma and Texas hands were reluctant to move to Arkansas,” Manaugh admitted. “But once they went and saw what a beautiful area Arkansas is, and how nice its communities are, they were pleased to work there.”
A Chesapeake storage reservoir makes good use of excess river water
in the Greater Little Creek Area.
Sustaining the environmental integrity of the state has been a priority from the first days of Chesapeake’s involvement in the Fayetteville Shale. “We have met with many environmental agencies, the Arkansas Game and Fish Department, the Corps of Engineers and citizens’ groups,” Manaugh said. “Our team has taken a lead to preserve and protect the environment – above and beyond industry standards. We’ve gone to great lengths, lining entire sites with plastic sheeting, building containment trenches and dikes and taking all the measures necessary to eliminate or minimize any potential contamination of the ground or water.”
McClanahan agreed. “We do everything possible to be the best operator from the environmental as well as the production perspective, so we’re implementing best practices to minimize impact. We treat the land like we would want our own land treated.”
Training programs prepare Arkansans for a new industry
Shale, Chesapeake has dramatically increased its drilling operations in the area, sparking both economic growth and demand for qualified workers.
To help meet this work force demand, Chesapeake and Nomac partnered with Arkansas State University-Beebe in Searcy to help fund the Floorhand Training Program. The first class was held in March 2007, and in its first year more than 250 men and women graduated from the program with more than half of those finding employment in the energy industry.
“The school has had a significant and positive impact on our personnel needs,” said Robert Kitchens, Nomac Operations Manager, Arkoma Region. “We look for people who will make a commitment to learn the trade and have a desire to grow with us. I look at the potential for future drillers and toolpushers with each interview. So far our retention of trainees is 73%. That tells me we have a good approach to selecting the best and most qualified people.”
“Not only does it improve the work force in the state,” he added, “but it also makes good business sense because these crews are close to home and working in their own backyards.”